NRA Sues to Remove Illinois Semi-Automatic Gun Ban

Springfield, IL. Illinois’ two-week-old semi-automatic weapons ban bans “ubiquitous” firearms in a “sweeping” challenge to the Second Amendment to the Constitution, claims a federal lawsuit filed Tuesday by the National Rifle Association.

The mighty NRA joined a parade of gun rights activists seeking to remove the newly minted ban on dozens of rapid-fire pistols and long guns, as well as high-capacity magazines or accessories.

Democratic Governor JB Pritzker signed the law on January 10. in response to shooting deaths of seven in July 4th parade in the Chicago suburb of Highland Parkwhere 30 were also injured. He has said he believes the law will withstand court challenges over its constitutionality.

Two individual gun owners from Benton, nine miles northeast of St. Louis, are the lead plaintiffs in the NRA’s lawsuit, the second to be filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois. They are joined by two gun dealers and shooting range operators from southern Illinois, as well as a Connecticut-based shooting sports trade association.

The NRA’s brief notes that the US Supreme Court’s landmark 2008 Heller decision refuses to leave any restrictions on “weapons in common use” in place today unless another ruling found last summer, there is evidence of an “enduring American tradition” of restraint.

The Illinois law “takes the radical step of banning nearly all modern semi-automatic rifles, the most popular type of rifle in the country, owned by tens of millions of Americans,” the document says.

The 24 million AR-15 semi-automatic rifles in circulation in the US far outnumber the 16 million Ford F-150 trucks, the country’s best-selling vehicle, according to the lawsuit.

A similar constitutional challenge was filed last week in the Benton-based Southern District. It was put forward by gun owners and gun rights groups.

Other lawsuits, filed in southern Illinois county courts, challenge the legislative process for passing the law.

CBS Chicago Notes that dozens of county sheriffs in Illinois they have said they will not check if legal gun owners register their guns, provoking a violent reaction in some places.

The plaintiffs in all of the lawsuits are likely to seek the southern Illinois courts due to a stronger provision toward Second Amendment rights. Guns are viewed much more favorably in central and southern Illinois, where there is a larger population of hunters and shooters, compared to northern metropolitan areas, particularly Chicago, which continues to fight deadly gun violence. .

The NRA-backed lawsuit also argues that the cartridge law’s ban on high-capacity ammunition (no more than 10 rounds for rifles and 15 for pistols) and a long list of attachments and other accessories is just as problematic because guns in question can’t work without them, so plugins are constitutionally protected “firearms” by inference.

Pritzker and allies nationwide refer to the weapons as “assault weapons.” The brief notes the tradition of carrying weapons and includes a glossary of terms. It explains that restricted semi-automatic weapons are not machine guns: ejecting each bullet requires a separate trigger pull.

He points out that the detachable magazines date from the Civil War and the semi-automatic power is a century old.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *